PERIODIC EXPENSES |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov. |
NGO Counterpart |
TRAINING |
Avg.1 | | | |
Seminars2 |
| | |
|
Training Food Distributors | | | | |
Outside-schooling |
| | |
|
Other/specifiy |
| | |
|
Total TRAINING: | |
0 | | |
| | | | |
CAPITAL GOODS EXPENSES |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov. |
NGO Counterpart |
CAPITAL3 |
SHARE4 | | | |
Trucks | | | | |
Cars | | | | |
Computers | |
| | |
Software | |
| | |
Typewriters |
| | |
|
Equipment | |
| | |
Furniture | |
| | |
Office Buildings Constructed | | | | |
Warehouses Constructed | | | | |
Pallets | |
| | |
Distribution Center Utensils, Measuring | | | | |
Education Materials |
| | |
|
Other/specify |
| | |
|
Total CAPITAL |
|
0 |
1 If training costs are bunched together just once every couple of years, the try to divide them across that number of years so that each year has a representative average.2 Include the fees of outside consultants.
3 Capital refers to long-term purchases. Again, the goal is to estimate the average expense per year. Therefore, if possible, divide the purchase of the capital item (using its current dollar price) by the number of years of its anticipated lifetime of use. Alternately, it is reasonable to estimate the yearly cost of the item by simply finding out the current rental price for the item on the local market.
4 Again, note the share of the items importance to the food-specific activities of the program. Use this fraction when estimating the relevant expenditure for items shared between projects.
RECURRING COSTS |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov.16 |
NGO Counterpart |
PORT CLEARING & TRANSPORT |
RATE: |
| | |
Port Fees, Taxes |
| | |
|
Clearing Fees |
| | |
|
Port Storage |
| | |
|
Rail Fees | |
| | |
Barge, Waterway |
| | |
|
Truck Contract6 | | | | |
Fuel7 |
| | |
|
Fleet Insurance |
| | |
|
Fleet Parts |
| | |
|
Other/specifiy |
| | |
|
Total PORT/TRANSPORT: | |
0 |
5 Ignore A.I.D.-arranged transport overland up to landlocked countries. A.I.D. may directly contract the port surveyor or negotiate clearing fees. Include these expenses as best you can. In several countries the Host Government provides rail transport. Estimate its value in terms of the expenses this spares you.6 Often private transporters are contracted for large-scale transport. This expense subsumes their attendant fuel, insurance costs, etc.
7 Even where the PVO contracts out for much transport, three are still local, pickup truck scale costs. These should be included here.
RECURRING COSTS |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov. |
NGO Counterpart8 |
RENT, UTILITIES |
SHARE9 | | | |
Central Office Rent |
| | |
|
Local Office Rent |
| | |
|
Postage | |
| | |
Telex, E-Mail |
| | |
|
Printing | |
| | |
Telephone | |
| | |
Central Warehouse Rent10 | |
| | |
Local Warehouse Rent11 | | | | |
Stationary, Ledgers |
| | |
|
Bagging Materials |
| | |
|
Fumigation | |
| | |
Distribution Centers Rent | | | | |
Forms/Waybills |
| | |
|
Utilities | |
| | |
Maintenance |
| | |
|
Repair (Warehouses & Offices) | | | | |
Other/specify |
| | |
|
Total RENT/UTILITIES: | |
0 |
8 Indigenous organizations with whom you work should be included if they are part of the food distribution network. Try to include their day-to-day incidental costs.9 This is extremely important. Most of the recurring costs support both food and non-food activities. It is important at least to estimate what share of expenses are related exclusively to the food distribution effort. In this column note what portion (.3? .5? .75?) of the annual expenses should be attributed to the food activities but not to complementary activities or other NGO projects unrelated to food.
10 Do not double count expenses already recorded under port storage.
11 Note the number of warehouses.
STAFF EXPENSES |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov. |
NGO Counterpart |
FRINGES & BENEFITS |
/Yr.12 | | | |
Severance | |
| | |
Pensions | |
| | |
Housing | |
| | |
Allowances | |
| | |
Insurance | |
| | |
Other Benefits |
| | |
|
Other/specify: |
| | |
|
(Benfits summed) |
| | |
|
Total SALARIES & FRINGE:13 | |
0 | ||
TRAVEL14 | |
| | |
Internal Trips (air) |
| | |
|
Internal Trips (land)15 | | | | |
Fuel | | | | |
Vehicle Insurance |
| | |
|
Parts/Lubricants |
| | |
|
Maintenance Labor |
| | |
|
Per Diems | |
| | |
Other/specify |
| | |
|
Total TRAVEL |
|
0 | ||
Warehouses Constructed | | | | |
Pallets | |
| | |
Distribution Center Utensils, Measuring | | | | |
Education Materials |
| | |
|
Other/specify |
| | |
|
Total CAPITAL: | | | | |
12 Remember that the values recorded in this section as well as the others are for annual tools, not monthly outlays. It is probably not useful to record anything in this (units) column.13 Add the totals here to the salaries totals on the previous page.
14 This section relates solely to the travel of personnel and equipment; commodity transport is recorded in another section. Include travel expenses of full-time staff as well as HQ visitors, monitors, consultants, etc.
15 Includes fees, bus fares, boat rentals, etc.
STAFF EXPENSES |
Units |
PVO |
AID/Host Gov.16 |
NGO Counterpart8 |
SALARIES |
FTE17 | | | |
Country Director18 | | | | |
Project Manager |
| | |
|
Commodities Manager |
| | |
|
Commodities Officers |
| | |
|
Transport Officers |
| | |
|
Port Officer/Surveyor | | | | |
Central Warehouse Rent10 | |
| | |
Secretaries19 | | | | |
Accountant | |
| | |
Bookkeeper | |
| | |
Auditors20 | | | | |
Distribution Staff21 | | | | |
Warehouse Managers22 | | | | |
Guards | | | | |
Office Drivers |
| | |
|
Food Truck Drivers |
| | |
|
Vehicle Maintenance |
| | |
|
Casual Labor |
| | |
|
Other/specify |
| | |
|
(Column Sums)- |
| |
0 |
0 |
| | | | |
Warehouses Constructed | | | | |
Pallets | |
| | |
Distribution Center Utensils, Measuring Devices, Cups... |
| | | |
Education Materials |
| | |
|
Other/specify |
| | |
|
Total CAPITAL |
| | |
|
16 This column should record contributions either in cash or in-kind by either the U.S. Government (e.g. AID, CCC) or by the host government. For in-kind contributions, please make the best possible estimate of the dollar value.17 Please note the number of full-time equivalents working in each category. This, multiplied by the mean salaries, gives the total expense. Record the sum of the portions of full-time staff devoted specifically to making the food program function, not for complementary activities.
18 For example, if there is one Country Director who spends 40% of his/her time administering the food programs, then the total FTE is .4.
19 If, for instance, there are 2 secretaries who work full-time on food programs, plus another 10 who work half-time on food programs, then the FTE is 7.0.
20 This may include full-time field monitors, or occasional preofessional auditors.
21 Remember that the goal is to capture the efforts of all persons working on the food program. This includes counterpart staff and the FTEs of professionals who spend part-time monitoring distributions.
22 Remember to include staff at each warehouse, both central and at the feeding sites.
Attachment taken from Food Aid Management, Food Aid Briefing, Preparation of MYOP, Washington, D.C. , November 1993
Exh E-2 HB 9
(TM 9:6) PAGE OF
TITLE II, PL 480 COMMODITIESANNUAL ESTIMATE OF REQUIREMENTS FY(See reverse for instructions) |
FORM APPROVED O.M.B. NO. 24-R0051 |
1. COUNTRY | |
| ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
2. COOPERATING SPONSOR | | | |
3. RECIPIENT CATEGORIES |
3a. |
4. |
5. |
5a. |
6 PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION | | | |||||||||
| |
| | |
a. | | |
a. | | |
a. | | |
a. | | |
| | | | |
b. NUMBER |
c. RATE |
d. METRICTONS |
b. NUMBER |
c. RATE |
d. METRICTONS |
b. NUMBER |
c. RATEKGS |
d. METRICTONS |
b. NUMBER |
c. RATE |
d. METRICTONS |
Maternal Child Health-Mother |
30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maternal Child Health-Child |
30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Preschool Child Feeding |
25 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Child Feeding |
30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Child Feeding |
25 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
School Feeding |
20 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food for Work-Workers |
30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food for Work-Dependents |
30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
7. TOTAL RECIPIENTS |
|
0 | | |
0 | | |
0 | | |
0 | | |
0 | | |
8. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FY | | | | | | |
0 | | |
0 | | |
0 | | |
0 |
ADJUSTED REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENT (METRIC TONS) | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||
9. Quantity on Hand September 30 | | | | | ||||||||||||
10. Quantity Received October 1 through February 28 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||||||||||
10a. From Prior Year Approval | | | | | ||||||||||||
10b. From Current Year Approval | | | | | ||||||||||||
11. Quantity on Hand February 28 | | | | | ||||||||||||
12. Quantity Due or Received for Current FY Program After February 19 | | |
| | ||||||||||||
13. Total Line 11 Plus Line 12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||||||||||
14. Projected Distribution March 1 through September 30 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
15. Estimated Inventory, September 30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||||||||||
16. Desired Operating Reserve | | | | | ||||||||||||
17. Adjusted Total Requirements FY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||||||||||||
CLEARANCES |
SIGNATURE |
TITLE |
DATE | |||||||||||||
18. Submitted by (Field Representative) | |
| | |||||||||||||
19. Reviewed and Recommended by US AID or Embassy: | | | | |||||||||||||
20. Cooperating Sponsor Approval | | | | |||||||||||||
21. ISC/AID - Washington Approval | | | |
AID 1550-3 (1-77)
Project Design & |
Procurement |
Shipping |
Internal transport, |
Distribution & |
Project Design: Weighing Procurement and Shipping Factors in the Planning Process
When designing a project, many United States Private Voluntary Organizations (PVOs) tend to focus on the end uses of food aid. One way to make better use of food aid resources is to ensure that procurement and shipping factors are also taken into consideration during program design. These factors include timing of commodity purchase, packaging, freight rates and cargo size.
Timing of commodity purchase
Commodity prices fluctuate based on tuning of the next harvest, existing stock levels, packaging and on commodity specifications. Because the U.S. Department of Agriculture is solely responsible for the purchase of commodities, PVOs are often unaware of these price factors. Procurement during times when a commodity is low in stock or high in demand tend to be more costly.
The precise details of commodity specifications should be reviewed annually and adjusted, if necessary. Prices to guarantee an extra percent of protein for some U.S. staples may for instance rise by several dollars per ton from one year to the next.
Packaging
To minimize cost, commodities should be packed and shipped in the largest possible packages. Smaller packages require more time and materials to supply a given commodity and more time and stevedoring labor to load and unload the vessel. In addition, smaller packages are more subject to pilferage.
If a commodity is to be shipped in containers, project planners should consider how many packages of a given commodity can fit in one 20' or 40' container based on the cubic dimensions and weight of the product. Both cost and damage can be minimized when only full containers are shipped.
Freight rates
Freight rates, like commodity prices, arc also governed by the laws of supply and demand. The number of US flag vessels regularly engaged in food aid transportation is very limited, probably employing 60 vessels or less on average. These vessels are heavily booked during August, September and October because freight must be contracted before the end of a particular fiscal/programming year. Although it may not always be convenient on the receiving end, being able to ship during 'off months such as January and February may often result in significant cost savings, and also meet cargo preference requirements, by making me of US flag vessels that would otherwise not be employed during these months
Cargo Size
Freight rates are lowest when the cargo size matches the loading capacity of the vessel. PVOs will incur nearly the same fixed voyage costs whether or not the vessel is fully loaded. Subsequently, for full vessel loads, these fixed costs are spread over a larger tonnage base, thus decreasing the freight rate per ton.
FY 1996 Title II Procurement Schedule
Calls Forward |
Invitation |
Purchase |
U.S. At Port |
Overseas |
Jul 3, 1995 |
085 |
August |
10/05-10/20 |
10/25-11/20 |
Aug 4, 1995 |
095 |
September |
11/05-11/20 |
11/25-12/20 |
Sep 1, 1995 |
105 |
October |
12/05-12/20 |
12/25-01/20 |
Oct 4, 1995 |
115 |
November |
01/05-01/20 |
01/25-02/20 |
Nov 3, 1995 |
125 |
December |
02/05-02/20 |
02/25-03/20 |
Dec 4, 1995 |
016 |
January |
03/05-03/20 |
03/25-04/20 |
Jan 4, 1996 |
026 |
February |
04/05-04/20 |
04/25-05/20 |
Feb 2, 1996 |
036 |
March |
05/05-05/20 |
05/25-06/20 |
Mar 4, 1996 |
046 |
April |
06/05-06/20 |
06/25-07/20 |
Apr 4, 1996 |
056 |
May |
07/05-07/20 |
07/25-08/20 |
May 3, 1996 |
066 |
June |
08/05-08/20 |
08/25-09/20 |
Jun 4, 1996* |
076 |
July |
09/05-09/20 |
09/25-10/20 |
* Last FY 1996 Processed Commodity Purcase
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Verification list for cleaning the warehouse
Name of the warehouse _____________________________________________________ | ||||
Location _________________________________________________________________ | ||||
A. Use of warehouse |
| | ||
|
1. Product stored |
| | |
|
2. Storage space |
| | |
| |
a. Capacity __________________________________________________________ | ||
| |
b. Area _____________________________________________________________ | ||
B. Conditions outside the warehouse |
Yes |
No | ||
|
1. Loading and unloading area |
____ |
____ | |
| |
a. Accumulations of grain or chaff? |
____ |
____ |
| |
b. Accumulations of garbage? |
____ |
____ |
|
2. Presence of grass or tall weeds? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. Piles of garbage or junk? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Evidence of rodents (burrows, etc.)? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Birds perching or nesting under the roof? |
____ |
____ | |
C. Maintaining the exterior of the warehouse | |
| ||
|
1. Does the roof need repair? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Holes in the walls where birds may enter? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. After closing the doors, are there still holes where rodents may enter? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Vents without screens? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Vents with damaged screens? |
____ |
____ | |
D. Maintenance of the warehouse |
____ |
____ | ||
|
1. Need to clean the floors? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Accumulations of garbage, equipment or junk in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. Need to clean the walls or the inside of the roof? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Is there rodent bait or pieces of glass on the ground? |
____ |
____ | |
E. Grain storage prcatices | | | ||
|
1. Is grain stored against the wall? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Is grain stacked on the floor? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. Are the stacks of grain separated from each other by at least one meter? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Is the grain stored close to the chemicals, pesticides, or strong smelling materials? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Are there broken bags of grain in stacks? |
____ |
____ | |
F. Insect infestations | | | ||
|
1. Are insects flying inside the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Insects or worms |
| | |
| |
a. On the floor? |
____ |
____ |
| |
b. On the outside of the bags? |
____ |
____ |
| |
c. Inside the grain bags? |
____ |
____ |
|
3. Traces of insects evident in the dust? |
____ |
____ | |
G. Conditions suggesting rodents or birds | |
| ||
|
1. Rat excrement visible on the floor or on top of sacks? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Do the stacks have bags chewed by rodents? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. Are rodents visible in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Traces of rodents in the dust? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Bird excrement on the floor or on bags? |
____ |
____ | |
|
6. Birds seen in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
H. Grain handling practices | | | ||
|
1. Has all grain been inspected when arriving at warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
2. Can the warehouse personnel identify the insects that infest the grain? |
____ |
____ | |
|
3. Is grain fumigated when insects are found? |
____ |
____ | |
|
4. Is grain fumigated when it arrives at the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Do workers report every evidence of rodents, insects or birds? |
____ |
____ | |
I. Control of infestation | | | ||
|
1. Is rat poison in use? |
____ |
____ | |
| |
a. On the outside of the warehouse |
____ |
____ |
| |
b. On the inside of the warehouse |
____ |
____ |
|
2. Are the stations for bait adequately maintained? |
____ |
____ | |
|
If no, why not?_____________________________________________________ | |
| |
|
3. What rat poisons are used in the warehouse? | | | |
|
4. Do the traps used in the warehouse have bait? |
____ |
____ | |
|
Are they set? |
____ |
____ | |
|
5. Are residual insecticides used in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
What residual insecticides were used? | |
| |
|
6. Are fog or spray insecticides used in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
Which insecticide was used as fog or spray?____________________________ |
| | |
|
7. Are fumigants used in the warehouse? |
____ |
____ | |
|
Which fumigants were used?_________________________________________ | | | |
|
8. Are records maintained of rodent control? |
____ |
____ | |
|
9. Are records maintained of insect control? |
____ |
____ | |
J. Warehouse administration | | | ||
|
1. Does the warehouse director make a preiodic inspection of the warehouse? |
____ |
____ |
Warehouse foreman
______________________________________________________
Quality control agent
_________________________________- Date________________
CARE
151 Ellis Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-2439
Tel 404
681-2552
Fax
404 577-6662
404 577-1205
ALMIS |
#4351 |
Date: |
October 10, 1994 |
To: |
Senior Staff Regional Foundation Offices Country Offices |
From: |
Bill Novelli |
Subject: |
Policy on losses and Fraudulent Acts |
CARE's reputation is its most valuable asset. We must all work to maintain the highest degree of accountability to our donors, and avoid or prevent situations which may compromise our position. Below is CARE's policy on losses and fraudulent acts. Please review and discuss it with all of your stff, post it in a central location, and take appropriate action if necessary. We will be forwarding translated copies as soon as they are available.
Management is resonsible for detecting defalcations, misappropriations, and other irregularities, and for having a system of internal control in place to reduce the risk of loss. This includes situations that occur due to the Country Director or Department Head's negligence in monitoring his/her staff, not having adequate systems to prevent losses or at a minimum detect them on a timely basis, not implementing the recommendations made as a result of audits (internal or external), and not adequately safeguarding CARE property (building, cars, etc.). In addition, each member of CARE's management team should be familiar with the types of improprieties that might occur within his/her area of responsibility and be alert for any indication of irregularity.
The terms defalcation, misappropriation, and other fiscal irregularities refer to, but are not limited to:
Any dishonest or fraudulent act;
Forgery or alteration of any document or account belonging to CARE (including, but not limited to time sheets, payroll and associated leave records and accounts, procurement documents, agricultural commodity records, spare parts or project materials and equipment inventory records, food commodity management and monitoring reports, etc.);
Forgery or alteration of a check, bank draft, or any other financial document;Misappropriation of funds, commodities, securities, supplies, spare parts, project materials and equipment, or other assets;
Impropriety in the handling or reporting of money, financial transactions, or bidding procedures;
Accepting or seeking anything of material value from vendors or persons providing services/materials to CARE (exceptions: perishable gifts intended for a group of employees, such as candy or flowers);
Destruction or misappropriation of records, furniture, fixtures, or equipment;
Diversion, alteration, or mismanagement of documents or information; and/or
Any similar or related irregularity.
Any employee who identifies or suspects an irregularity has an obligation to report this to his/her immediate supervisor. If the employee is not satisfied after discussions, or has reason to believe that the supervisor is involved, he/she should speak with the manager at the next level.
Once the detected or suspected irregularity has been identified, management (domestic: Division or Department Head and overseas: the Country Director) must immediately report the incident to Trish Shannon, Director of Internal Audit, who coordinates all investigations with General Counsel and other affected areas, both internal and external. Country Directors should notify the Regional Manager at the time Internal Audit is notified.
If an employee suspects dishonest or fraudulent activity, he/she should report such activity through the normal chain of supervision. However, if this is not possible, Trish is available to discuss such matters on a confidential basis.
This policy applies to any irregularity, or suspected irregularity, involving not only employees, but also vendors and other outside parties. Investigations will be conducted without regard to length of service, position, title, or relationship.
Please confirm to Trish Shannon, no later than November 15, 1994, that you and your staff have read this ALMIS.
If there is any question as to whether an action constitutes fraud, or if you have any questions about this policy, please contact Trish Shannon for guidance.
Thank you.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FEES PAID
I hereby certify that CARE, Inc. has incurred and paid $142.00 in marine Survey fees for the attached Survey Report in connection with the discharge of 2,268 cartons of Vegetable Oil loaded on board the SS/MV FALCON V-133
_________________________
OFFICIAL INVENTORY Name and Title
Tegucigalpa, M.D.C., July, 1995
brl./mrm
CODES FOR COMMODITY TYPE, LOSS LOCATION, AND LOSS TYPE
COMMODITY CODES |
LOSS TYPE CODES |
005 - Bulgur |
BAG FAILURE WITH SPILLAGE |
007 - Corn |
(Contents not contaminated, deteriorated, or infested) |
009 - Cornmeal |
101 - Mechanically ripped, torn, cut or punctured |
011 - CSB (Corn-Soy Blend) |
102 - Burst |
012 - CSB, Instant |
103 - Loosened adhesive when bag is water damaged |
013 - CSM, Instant |
104 - Punctured by insects |
014 - CSM (Corn-Soy-Milk) |
105 - Other bag damage problems |
015 - Grain Sorghum |
|
018 - Non-fat Dried Milk | |
019 - Rolled Oats |
|
021 - Rice, Milled |
|
023 - Soy Foritifed Bulghur | |
025 - Soy Fortified Cornmeal | |
027 - Soy Fortified Flour 6% |
DEFECTIVE BAGS |
029 - Soy Fortified Flour 12% |
110 - Leaking longitudinal or side seam |
031 - Soy Fortified Rolled Oats |
111 - Leaking closure, bottom |
032 - Soy Fortified Sorghum Grits |
112 - Leaking closure, top |
033 - Full Fat Soy Flour |
113 - Corners peeling |
035 - Defatted Soy Flour |
114 - Wrinkled along fold, bottom |
039 - Vegoil, Soybean Salad |
115 - Wrinkled along fold, top |
040 - Vegoil, Peanut |
116 - Tapered closure |
041 - Wheat |
117 - Loosened adhesive when bag is not water damaged |
043 - Wheat Flour |
|
045 - Wheat Rolled |
|
046 - Whey Soy Drink Mix | |
047 - WSB (Wheat-Soy Blend) | |
LOSS LOCATION CODES |
EXPOSED STITCHING |
1 - Lost during ocean transport |
118 - Tape improperly positioned, top |
2 - Lost during in-country transport |
119 - Tape wrinkled, top |
3 - Lost in customs warehouse |
120 - Tape not adhering, top |
4 - Lost in agency warehouse |
121 - Tape improperly positioned, bottom |
5 - Other |
122 - Tape wrinkled, bottom |
|
123 - Tape not adhering, bottom |
|
124 - Other defect or stitching problem |
MOLDY BAGS |
INFESTED WITH INSECTS |
201 - Combined with spilled commodity |
601 - Infested and bag failure |
202 - Spilled commodity absent |
623 (Note: Use suffixes 01 - 23 from 100 series, i.e. Infested and Burst = 600 + 02 = 602) |
SHORT WEIGHT BAGS |
625 - Undamaged and opened bags |
301 - Quantity received less than specified weight (Note: include number of bags affected on back) |
626 - Undamaged and unopened bags |
CONTAMINATED but NOT INFESTED |
627 - Patched, taped, over-slipped, or rebagged commodity |
401 - Soiled by rodents, birds, or animals |
INFERIOR GRADE |
402 - Mixed with water |
701 - Excess dockage |
403 - Mixed with chemicals, pesticides, petroleum products, etc. |
702 - Excess broken kernels |
404 - Contains rope spores in original bag |
703 - Excess other grain or leguminous seeds |
405 - Contains noxious seeds (original bag or bulk grains) |
704 - Other problems affecting grade |
406 - Other contamination problem |
OTHER UNSPECIFIED REASON FOR LOSSES |
|
801 - Specify reason __________ |
DETERIORATED but NOT INFESTED or CONTAMINATED | |
(Commodity is discolored and/or tastes or smells unclean, stale or musty) | |
501 - Deteriorated and bag failure | |
523 (Note: Use suffixes 01 - 23 from 100 series, i.e. Deteriorated and Corners Peeling = 500 + 13 = 513) | |
525 - Undamaged and opened bags | |
526 - Undamaged and unopened bags | |
527 - Patched, taped, over-slipped, or rebagged commodity |
|
CARE
151 Ellis Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-2439
Tel 404
681-2552
Fax
404 577-6662
404 577-1205
Date: |
July 27, 1995 |
To: |
Ms. Sally Nunn Commodity Credit Corporation USDA-ASCS |
Subject: |
Reimbursement of Reconstitution Expenses India #2507 P for Rs. 89,133.40 or USD 2,822.46 |
Dear Ms. Nunn:
Enclosed please find documents supporting the above referenced request for reimbursement of reconstitution cost in accordance with AID Regulation 11, Section 211.7 (e) (iii).
Please make check payable to CARE and forward to my attention.
Sincerely,
Imelda C. Zumbro
Logistics/Transportation & PL480 Officer
cc: CARE-India
CARE
151 Ellis Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-2439
Tel 404
681-2552
Fax
404 577-6662
404 577-1205
Date: |
July 12, 1995 |
To: |
Imelda Zumbro CARE USA |
From: |
P.R. Chauhan CARE India |
Subject: |
Reimbursement of reconstitution expenses incurred on reconstitution of damages that took place after discharge of cargo by Ocean Carrier at Visakhapatnam Port Rs. 89,133.40 or $2,822.46 |
Dear Imelda:
According to AID Regulation 11 Section 211.7 (f) (iii) the Volag is permitted to claim reimbursement of the expenses incurred on reconstitution of damages that have taken place after discharge of the cargo by Ocean Carrier. Attached is a statement giving details of Reconstitution expenses by shipments together with photocopies of the supporting invoices in duplicate.
Please retain one set and forward one set to CCC with a request for reimbursement to CARE India in U.S. Dollars.
Please acknowledge receipt.
Thank you.
Warm regards,
P.R. Chauhan
Encls: a.a.
Figure
Figure
Figure
CARE CERTIFICATE OF DESTRUCTION
Location (name or #): ________________________ |
Date: ____________________________ |
Shipment #: _______________________________ |
Commodity Type: __________________ |
Loss and Adjustment Report #: _______________ |
Unit (bag/carton/drum): _____________ |
Date of Authorization to Destroy: ______________ |
Unit Weight: ______________________ |
Donor: ___________________________________ |
Contract ID #: _____________________ |
Commodity: _________________________
Place of
Destruction:________________________________________
Date of
Destruction:_________________________________________
Method of Destruction:
______________________________________
The unfit commodity has been destroyed in such a manner as to prevent its return for animal or human consumption.
CARE Employee Supervising Destruction:
Signature: __________________________ |
Designation: _________________ |
Govt. Representative Assisting Destruction | |
Signature: __________________________ |
Designation: _________________ |
Independent Witness to Destruction | |
Signature: __________________________ |
Designation: _________________ |
CARE program Incharge's | |
Signature: __________________________ |
Designation: _________________ |
*Certificate should be attached to Loss and Adjustment Report.
Original |
Copy 1 |
Copy 2 |
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure