Back to Home Page of CD3WD Project or Back to list of CD3WD Publications

CLOSE THIS BOOKSoap Production (CDI, 1995, 70 p.)
VIEW THE DOCUMENT(introduction...)
VIEW THE DOCUMENT1. INTRODUCTION
VIEW THE DOCUMENT2. GENERAL INFORMATION ON SOAP
VIEW THE DOCUMENT3. THE RAW MATERIALS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT4. THE MANUFACTURE OF SOAP
VIEW THE DOCUMENT5. THE TREATMENT OF OILS AND FATS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT6. SAPONIFICATION: COLD PROCESS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT7. SAPONIFICATION: SEMI-BOILED PROCESS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT8. SAPONIFICATION: FULL BOILED PROCESS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT9. SAPONIFICATION: CONTINUOUS PROCESS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT10. THE COOLING AND DRYING OF SOAP
VIEW THE DOCUMENT11. FINISHING SOAP
VIEW THE DOCUMENT12. PRODUCTION OPTIONS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT13. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
VIEW THE DOCUMENT14. CDI EXPERIENCE IN SOAP FACTORY PROJECTS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT15. IMPLEMENTING A SOAP FACTORY PROJECT
VIEW THE DOCUMENT16. EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT17. TURNKEY SUPPLIERS AND ENGINEERING OFFICES
VIEW THE DOCUMENT18. THE SOAP MAKERS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT19. DEVELOPING A SOAP FACTORY PROJECT
VIEW THE DOCUMENT20. CHECKLIST: RAW MATERIALS
VIEW THE DOCUMENT21. CHECKLIST: THE SOAP MARKET
VIEW THE DOCUMENT22. CHECKLIST: DATA FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY
ANNEXES
VIEW THE DOCUMENT23. SERVICES OFFERED BY THE CDI
VIEW THE DOCUMENTOTHER TITLES
VIEW THE DOCUMENTBACK COVER

13. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES

Although a somewhat arbitrary statement, it can be said that cold and semi-boiled processes, aiming to produce standard soap likely to meet widespread local demand, should be more suitable for ACP promoters interested first and foremost in penetrating their local markets than the other processes. These processes - using simple and proven technology - are considered more appropriate bearing in mind the isolation and the difficult industrial environment of projects in ACP countries.

Full boiled or continuous processes are designed to produce neat soap for high-grade soaps aimed at a more demanding clientele. These processes are more suitable for production units run by international groups - such as Unilever, Henkel, Colgate Palmolive or Procter & Gamble - which enjoy a brand name and possess considerable management and marketing expertise. Although the full boiled process is proportionately more economical in terms of investment, it takes ± 5 times as much steam as the continuous process, and this places substantial pressure on operating costs. In this respect, continuous processes are tending to supersede full boiled processes, at least for new installations.

The table below compares a few typical consumption figures for the different manufacturing process:


Cold process

Semi-boiled process

Full boiled process

Continuous process

Fats

600 kg

600 kg

660 kg

660 kg

NaOH (36%)

220 - 300 kg

220 - 300 kg

240 - 330 kg

240 - 330 kg

NaCl (21%)

-

-

110 - 190 kg

110 - 190 kg

Crude soap (58%) or
Neat soap (62%)

1,000 kg

1,000 kg

1,000 kg

1,000 kg

Steam

-

30 - 40 kg

800 - 1,000 kg

100 - 150 kg

Cooling water

-

-

-

2 - 4 m3

Electricity

10 - 30 kWh

30 - 40 kWh

2 - 3 kWh

35 - 45 kWh

Generally:

· the minimum size of a soap factory (small-scale or semi-industrial) is regarded as ± 250 kg/h for an investment starting at ECU 250,000;

· an industrial soap factory is one with a capacity of 500 kg/h or more;

· continuous processes are not considered cost-effective below 1,000 kg/h (investment of 1.5 to 3 million ECU depending on the options chosen for a turnkey soap factory);

· the initial investment ranges from ECU 150 to 500 per tonne of soap per year, depending on the process, the size of the finishing line, the production capacity and potential economies of scale;

· the investment necessary for a production unit with double the capacity (all options being equal) is generally multiplied by a factor of 1.5;

· the installations are never modular, which means that any expansion of capacity needs to be anticipated at the start of the project.

The table below compares the processes on the basis of a number of general criteria. These are merely considerations which generally affect the choice of processes, but which may nevertheless vary from one manufacturer to another.


Cold process

Semi-boiled process

Full boiled process

Continuous process

Typical production capacity

250 to 1,000 kg/h

500 to 2,000 kg/h

500 to > 5,000 kg/h

> 1,000 kg/h

Type of soap

low-grade household soap

standard household soap

standard to top-grade toilet and laundry soap

Flexibility of production

low

average

high

average

Labour requirement

high

high

high

low

Investment costs in ECU per tonne per year*

150 to 250

200 to 300

250 to 400

300 to 500

* Very rough estimate, directly linked to the configuration, capacity and production options.

TO PREVIOUS SECTION OF BOOK TO NEXT SECTION OF BOOK

CD3WD Project Donate